Do you have any further comments or suggestions about the suggested approach to Policy S6?
Local Plan Q43b)
| Responder id | Responder name | Content name | Question | Answer |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 384 | guycwilkerson | Lakeside North Harbour (Q43) | Question 43b: Do you have any further comments or suggestions about the suggested approach to Policy S6? | Keep lakeside as offices and move offices there from the city centre freeing up city centre space for housing. Maybe even relocate the university to lakeside. M27 junction to East needs major revamp to cope with the traffic. |
| 422 | Lakeside North Harbour (Q43) | Question 43b: Do you have any further comments or suggestions about the suggested approach to Policy S6? | Keep the area as it is! Just another excuse to build more homes and not have the services e.g. GP to support it! | |
| 441 | Lakeside North Harbour (Q43) | Question 43b: Do you have any further comments or suggestions about the suggested approach to Policy S6? | these businesses would be better served in the city centre with improved links. this could be a whole new sustainable community | |
| 444 | adrian_legg | Lakeside North Harbour (Q43) | Question 43b: Do you have any further comments or suggestions about the suggested approach to Policy S6? | Office space demand is going to fall going forwards, so we should consider some mixed use/residential here otherwise we could end up with a white elephant. |
| 445 | Lakeside North Harbour (Q43) | Question 43b: Do you have any further comments or suggestions about the suggested approach to Policy S6? | Natural site which comes with benefits and disadvantages - the birds who live there while look lovely in their natural habitat, they are a nuisance and cause a lot of mess. | |
| 514 | Lakeside North Harbour (Q43) | Question 43b: Do you have any further comments or suggestions about the suggested approach to Policy S6? | I fundamentally disagree with crowding another 500 houses on one of the few green spaces we have left in or around the city. | |
| 518 | nigel.wheatley | Lakeside North Harbour (Q43) | Question 43b: Do you have any further comments or suggestions about the suggested approach to Policy S6? | I don't support the use of the site for residential use - its close proximity to the motorway, already congested infrastructure and being surrounded by office and factory buildings would created an isolated area. |
| 551 | Lakeside North Harbour (Q43) | Question 43b: Do you have any further comments or suggestions about the suggested approach to Policy S6? | Flood risk, lack of amenities. | |
| 563 | Lakeside North Harbour (Q43) | Question 43b: Do you have any further comments or suggestions about the suggested approach to Policy S6? | This would mean further loss of soft landscape, social amenities and drainage as well as road congestion. | |
| 564 | jessica_maria | Lakeside North Harbour (Q43) | Question 43b: Do you have any further comments or suggestions about the suggested approach to Policy S6? | Prevent the build. Impact on services, such as Drs, schools, infrastructure demand will be too high. Plus causing a change from flood risk to zone 1 to zone 3 |
38 rows found
Page 1 of 4