Considering the conclusion of the Viability Assessment of the Local Plan there is a risk that the proposed 30% requirement for affordable housing (which would potentially be viable for less than half of expected developments in Portsmouth), is undeliverable. This would therefore require frequent case by case viability testing.
Due to this risk, is there an alternative requirement for affordable housing provision that should be considered?
Local Plan Q6c)
| Responder_id | Responder_name | Content_name | field4 | Question | Answer |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 381 | janathome | Feedback (Q4-10) | 159 | Question 6c: Considering the conclusion of the Viability Assessment of the Local Plan there is a risk that the proposed 30% requirement for affordable housing (which would potentially be viable for less than half of expected developments in Portsmouth), is undeliverable. This would therefore require frequent case by case viability testing. Due to this risk, is there an alternative requirement for affordable housing provision that should be considered? | ii. No |
| 389 | Feedback (Q4-10) | 159 | Question 6c: Considering the conclusion of the Viability Assessment of the Local Plan there is a risk that the proposed 30% requirement for affordable housing (which would potentially be viable for less than half of expected developments in Portsmouth), is undeliverable. This would therefore require frequent case by case viability testing. Due to this risk, is there an alternative requirement for affordable housing provision that should be considered? | ii. No | |
| 390 | jlloyd | Feedback (Q4-10) | 159 | Question 6c: Considering the conclusion of the Viability Assessment of the Local Plan there is a risk that the proposed 30% requirement for affordable housing (which would potentially be viable for less than half of expected developments in Portsmouth), is undeliverable. This would therefore require frequent case by case viability testing. Due to this risk, is there an alternative requirement for affordable housing provision that should be considered? | i. Yes |
| 404 | scottgreen | Feedback (Q4-10) | 159 | Question 6c: Considering the conclusion of the Viability Assessment of the Local Plan there is a risk that the proposed 30% requirement for affordable housing (which would potentially be viable for less than half of expected developments in Portsmouth), is undeliverable. This would therefore require frequent case by case viability testing. Due to this risk, is there an alternative requirement for affordable housing provision that should be considered? | iii. Not sure / don't know |
| 405 | martin | Feedback (Q4-10) | 159 | Question 6c: Considering the conclusion of the Viability Assessment of the Local Plan there is a risk that the proposed 30% requirement for affordable housing (which would potentially be viable for less than half of expected developments in Portsmouth), is undeliverable. This would therefore require frequent case by case viability testing. Due to this risk, is there an alternative requirement for affordable housing provision that should be considered? | i. Yes |
| 416 | andrewpreston | Feedback (Q4-10) | 159 | Question 6c: Considering the conclusion of the Viability Assessment of the Local Plan there is a risk that the proposed 30% requirement for affordable housing (which would potentially be viable for less than half of expected developments in Portsmouth), is undeliverable. This would therefore require frequent case by case viability testing. Due to this risk, is there an alternative requirement for affordable housing provision that should be considered? | i. Yes |
| 424 | rbarlow | Feedback (Q4-10) | 159 | Question 6c: Considering the conclusion of the Viability Assessment of the Local Plan there is a risk that the proposed 30% requirement for affordable housing (which would potentially be viable for less than half of expected developments in Portsmouth), is undeliverable. This would therefore require frequent case by case viability testing. Due to this risk, is there an alternative requirement for affordable housing provision that should be considered? | i. Yes |
| 436 | Feedback (Q4-10) | 159 | Question 6c: Considering the conclusion of the Viability Assessment of the Local Plan there is a risk that the proposed 30% requirement for affordable housing (which would potentially be viable for less than half of expected developments in Portsmouth), is undeliverable. This would therefore require frequent case by case viability testing. Due to this risk, is there an alternative requirement for affordable housing provision that should be considered? | i. Yes | |
| 441 | Feedback (Q4-10) | 159 | Question 6c: Considering the conclusion of the Viability Assessment of the Local Plan there is a risk that the proposed 30% requirement for affordable housing (which would potentially be viable for less than half of expected developments in Portsmouth), is undeliverable. This would therefore require frequent case by case viability testing. Due to this risk, is there an alternative requirement for affordable housing provision that should be considered? | i. Yes | |
| 442 | Roseanne | Feedback (Q4-10) | 159 | Question 6c: Considering the conclusion of the Viability Assessment of the Local Plan there is a risk that the proposed 30% requirement for affordable housing (which would potentially be viable for less than half of expected developments in Portsmouth), is undeliverable. This would therefore require frequent case by case viability testing. Due to this risk, is there an alternative requirement for affordable housing provision that should be considered? | iii. Not sure / don't know |
108 rows found
Page 1 of 11